We develop methods, benchmarks, and training systems that turn expert data into frontier AI

building benchmarks and collaborating with

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
agent-le-logo
rdi-foundation
Cua Logo
Image
Image
key research areas

Vision and impact

We help labs advance frontier models by working with domain experts to design and build complex, realistic datasets that drive model performance.

initiatives

Community and open science

Open benchmarks, conversations, and research for real-world AI performance.

Image

Open Benchmarks Grants

Backed by a $30M commitment, Open Benchmarks Grants funds new benchmarks, red-teams existing ones to find weaknesses, and supports researchers through a fellowship.

Image

Benchtalks

Our podcast series at the intersection of AI evaluation, data quality, and real-world impact.
Image

Reading Group

A recurring forum for researchers and practitioners to explore the latest frontier developments in AI while building meaningful connections within the community.

DEEP RESEARCH Expertise

Technical advisors and distinguished affiliates

Stephen Bach headshot

Stephen Bach

Brown University
Eliot Horowitz Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
Jason Fries headshot

Jason Fries

Stanford University
Assistant Professor of Biomedical Data Science and of Medicine
Jared Dunnmon headshot

Jared Dunnmon

Co-Founder & Chief Scientist, Stealth Startup
Prev. Dir. of AI at DIU
Fred Sala headshot

Fred Sala

Chief Scientist
,
Snorkel AI
Assistant Professor @ University of Wisconsin-Madison
Chris Ré headshot

Chris Ré

Co-Founder
,
Snorkel AI
Professor @ Stanford University
Ludwig Schmidt headshot

Ludwig Schmidt

Stanford University
Researcher
Karthik Narasimhan headshot

Karthik Narasimhan

Princeton University
Professor of Computer Science
Yu Su headshot

Yu Su

Ohio State University
Associate Professor of Computer Science and Engineering
Lewis Tunstall headshot

Lewis Tunstall

Hugging Face
Machine Learning Engineer
PUBLICATIONS

Browse research blogs
and academic papers

Type: All Types
Sort: Newest
Frontier Data Summit 2026 Recap
Blog
NEW
Frontier Data Summit 2026 Recap

As agents get more capable, the data and evaluations that measure them have to become a science in their own right. Here are the sessions, takeaways and videos from the Frontier Data Summit.

Oct 16, 2026 •
Learn more about Frontier Data Summit 2026 Recap
When Partial Credit Opposes Completion
Blog
NEW
When Partial Credit Opposes Completion

AI agents are increasingly trusted with long, open-ended work. They fix bugs across large repositories, operate terminals for hours, and chain numerous tool calls toward a single goal. The strongest models now solve a meaningful share of such tasks, yet on the hardest ones failure is still the common outcome, and closing that gap is one of the central problems…

Oct 15, 2026 •
Learn more about When Partial Credit Opposes Completion
Frontier AI is Accelerating. Open Benchmarks Need to Keep Up.
Blog
NEW
Frontier AI is Accelerating. Open Benchmarks Need to Keep Up.

Today, we’re excited to announce that we are expanding our Open Benchmarks Grants by 10x to a $30M commitment, to support researchers, domain experts, and open-source teams pushing the frontier of robust, open frontier AI evaluation. The expanded program includes: Through our initial $3M commitment to Open Benchmarks Grants (OBG) and our broader research collaborations, we’ve partnered with the teams…

Oct 07, 2026 •
Learn more about Frontier AI is Accelerating. Open Benchmarks Need to Keep Up.
MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Blog
MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA

Yuexing Hao presents MedPAIR, a dataset comparing which sentences physicians and LLMs find relevant in clinical questions. Humans and LLMs agree on only 50 to 60% of relevance labels.

Oct 02, 2026 •
Learn more about MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Can Agents Design Libraries for Agents?
Agents increasingly build on code written by other agents, and they reimplement rather than reuse, growing the codebases later agents must work in. To measure how well agents design libraries for other agents, we introduce LibraryDesignBench, a two-phase benchmark in which an agent implements a full-featured library from a specification that defines required capabilities and potential use cases without prescribing the design. We evaluate the library through the correctness and simplicity of programs written by three user agents from different model families. The benchmark spans 242 expert-validated programming problems across 15 library-design tasks in four languages. On eleven of the...
Research Paper
Can Agents Design Libraries for Agents?

Agents increasingly build on code written by other agents, and they reimplement rather than reuse, growing the codebases later agents must work in. To measure how well agents design libraries for other agents, we introduce LibraryDesignBench, a two-phase benchmark in which an agent implements a full-featured library from a specification that defines required capabilities and potential use cases without prescribing…

Sep 30, 2026 •

Gabriel Orlanski, Alex L. Zhang, Avi Trost, Vincent Sunn Chen, Frederic Sala, Aws Albarghouthi, Ludwig Schmidt

Learn more about Can Agents Design Libraries for Agents?
RL environments for LLM agents: Design, rewards, and validation
Blog
RL environments for LLM agents: Design, rewards, and validation

TLDR: An agent, by definition, can take actions and is more than just a language model. The model is only one part of the system, and is only one element that you are training. The environment determines what the agent can observe, what it can change, which actions are available, and what behavior receives a reward. For a coding agent,…

Sep 28, 2026 •
Learn more about RL environments for LLM agents: Design, rewards, and validation
Opus 5.5 vs Opus 5 vs Fable 5.1: Coding Benchmark Results
Blog
Opus 5.5 vs Opus 5 vs Fable 5.1: Coding Benchmark Results

We’ve now run three generations of frontier models through the same expert-created terminal-bench style task set: Fable 5.1 in September, Opus 5 in July, and, now Opus 5.5. For this analysis, the task set contained 200 trajectories, of 24 tasks, with every failure traced to a judge-confirmed root cause. A generational climb On the task set, pass@1 is 61.5% for…

Sep 23, 2026 •
Learn more about Opus 5.5 vs Opus 5 vs Fable 5.1: Coding Benchmark Results
Data 2.0 and the research era of AI data
Blog
Data 2.0 and the research era of AI data

Today, I’m excited to announce Snorkel’s $350M Series E financing at a $3.5B valuation, led by Insight and S32, with participation from Third Point, March, Blumberg, Allegis, Standard VC, Frontline, and existing investors Addition, Lightspeed, Greylock, GV, P7, Wells Fargo, Walden Catalyst Ventures, and Factory.

Sep 22, 2026 •
Learn more about Data 2.0 and the research era of AI data
Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial
Blog
Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial

Grok 4.7 was evaluated on Senior SWE-Bench, our benchmark for measuring whether coding agents work like senior engineers. It reaches a tasteful pass@3 of 40.0%, up from 38.9% for Grok 4.6, ranking sixth overall at $0.24 per trial, which is a fraction of the cost compared to Opus 4.8. Benchmark Senior SWE-Bench evaluates agents as compared to a senior engineer….

Sep 22, 2026 •
Learn more about Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial
1 2 … 41
 Illution Back
Illution Front

Let’s research together

Join our team of leading researchers and help shape the future of AI.