Applied AI
Data development

Fine-tuned representation models boost LLM systems. Here’s how

March 5, 2024
5 min read

Representation models significantly impact the performance of AI applications. We’ve seen this working with clients at Snorkel AI. Standard representation models often fell short on our clients’ specialized tasks, leading to poor application performance. While we use many tools to sharpen their applications, representation model fine-tuning sometimes prove the most effective.

I recently had the opportunity to delve into our work on representation models at our Enterprise LLM Summit. I explored the fundamental concepts of representation models and their crucial role in machine learning tasks.

The discussion centered on the importance of data quality and the role of data augmentation techniques in improving the robustness and effectiveness of representation models. We also ventured into the strategic use of these models in retrieval augmented generation (RAG), an AI process designed to optimize the outputs of large language models (LLMs).

I recommend you watch the whole presentation, embedded below, but I have summarized the main points here.

Understanding Representation Models

Let’s start with the basics. Representation models are a class of machine learning models designed to capture and encode meaningful features from raw data. These models enable classification, clustering, similarity calculations, information retrieval, and other tasks.

Representation models often serve as part of a broader machine learning system, and their outputs feed downstream uses. The models’ training teaches them to keep conceptually similar objects closer together in the latent feature space.

In the context of RAG pipelines, representation models can play multiple crucial roles. They fuel the indexing process where the model encodes the corpus of data into a dense vector space. The same model also encodes the user’s query for retrieval. After retrieval, another class of representation models, known as cross-encoders, takes in pairs of inputs and learns their joint representation for the re-ranking process which often improves performance. Thus, representation models are integral to the effective functioning of RAG pipelines.

Image1

What is retrieval augmented generation (RAG)?

RAG attempts to improve LLM outputs by incorporating an additional information retrieval step—and generally succeeds in doing so. This retrieval step augments the prompt sent to the model by adding context. For example, injecting one or more paragraphs about football if someone asks a question about the National Football League.

Fine-tuning these models can help ensure the retrieval stage identifies all the documents relevant to a user’s query, and then ensures that it accurately ranks the documents in order of importance.

Fine tuning representation models

Pre-trained representation models typically learn their feature space on large and diverse datasets. While these models easily separate documents about moon landings and moon pies, they can struggle with nuance on narrow topics—which is what enterprises typically need.

This is where fine-tuning comes in. By adapting these pre-trained models to a specific task, dataset or intent, we can leverage the knowledge they gained from the pre-training phase and further optimize them for our unique needs. This results in models that better understand and encode the nuances of your specific data or domain, leading to improved performance.

Data scientists most frequently fine tune representation models through two approaches: task adaptation and full model fine tuning. Task adaptation fine tunes a portion of a network’s layer, which requires a smaller amount of data. This adapts the model to the new task efficiently and reduces the risk of overfitting. Full model fine-tuning trains the entire network on your task-specific data set. While this typically requires more data, it allows for a more comprehensive adaptation to the specific task, often leading to superior performance.

Image2

The role of data quality and augmentation

The success of fine tuned representation models heavily relies on the quality of the data used in the llm fine tuning process. Data that lacks diversity or does not capture certain edge cases may create a model that underperforms when faced with real-world scenarios. In such cases, data scientists may consider data augmentation or synthesis techniques.

Data augmentation increases the diversity and quantity of training data without collecting new examples. It applies transformations to the existing data to create new data points. This helps create a more robust and comprehensive dataset, thereby improving performance.

Our Snorkel Flow AI data development platform allows users to apply scalable and effective data augmentation techniques. It facilitates methods such as embedding and clustering techniques to determine similar or dissimilar points. This can help create “hard negatives,” which are data points that are very similar to the positive examples but not relevant. These hard negatives help fine tune the model’s ability to distinguish between similar concepts that it initially struggled to disambiguate between.

Snorkel Flow also enables users to easily slice and filter their data. This helps users identify the source of errors and allows them to focus their augmentation techniques efficiently. For instance, it can allow a user to identify that a certain subset lacks sufficient representative data, and augment it.

Data + representation mode fine tuning = better RAG

Training data quality and the use of data augmentation techniques play a crucial role in the success of fine-tuning representation models. By ensuring your data is representative and diverse, and by effectively leveraging data augmentation methods, you can significantly enhance the performance and robustness of your models.

More Snorkel AI events coming!

Snorkel has more live online events coming. Look at our events page to sign up for research webinars, product overviews, and case studies.

If you're looking for more content immediately, check out our YouTube channel, where we keep recordings of our past webinars and online conferences.

Share this article
trung nguyen headshot
Trung Nguyen
Software Engineer

Recommended articles

View all articles
benchmarks-3-axis
The Art and Science of Building AI Benchmarks That Shape the Field
Vincent Sunn Chen spoke at AI Engineer London about what it actually takes to build AI benchmarks that move the field forward, not just measure it. The throughline is an asymmetry that keeps showing up across deployments and the 150+ proposals reviewed for the Open Benchmarks Grants: agent capabilities are climbing fast, but the ability to measure those agents with
June 16, 2026
Snorkel Team
Image
Cua-Bench: benchmarking computer-use agents on professional software
TL;DR We built a benchmark of 25 expert-authored KiCad schematic-editing tasks and ran a frontier computer-use agent against them. The headline numbers: 1. Why build a computer-use benchmark for electrical engineering? Most computer-use benchmarks today live in the same handful of apps: web browsers, file managers, generic productivity suites. Those evaluations are useful, but they share a structural weakness —
June 15, 2026
Armin Parchami
,
Zhengyang (Jason) Qi
agentic-in-action
The Standard for Agents You Can Trust: Lessons from the Federal Front Lines
In the first installment of Agentic in Action — a series about real AI deployments, not demos — Snorkel AI’s Kevin Olivieri sat down with three people who have spent their careers where trust isn’t optional: Chris Sniffen, Federal Applied AI Lead at Snorkel AI; John Hickey, President of August Schell; and Mike Baca, CIO of August Schell. The conversation focused on
June 5, 2026
Snorkel Team
Image

Join our newsletter

For expert advice, the latest research, and exclusive events.
By submitting this form, I acknowledge I will receive email updates from Snorkel AI, and I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that my information will be used in accordance with the Privacy Policy.