Research

PonderNet: Learning to Ponder by DeepMind

November 10, 2021
3 min read

Machine Learning Whiteboard (MLW) Open-source Series

For our new visitors, we started our machine learning whiteboard (MLW) series earlier this year as an open-invite space to brainstorm ideas and discuss the latest papers, techniques, and workflows in the AI space. In which, we emphasize an informal and open environment to everyone interested in learning about machine learning. So, if you are interested in learning about ML, we encourage you to join us on our next ML whiteboard.In this episode, Curtis Giddings, a machine learning engineer with our information extraction team, focuses on “PonderNet: Learning to Ponder,” by Andrea Banino, Jan Balaguer, and Charles Blundell, one of the most recent DeepMind papers presented at ICML 2021. As you may know, DeepMind usually comes up with many exciting ideas and new state-of-the-art research, and PonderNet is no exception. This episode is part of the #MLwhiteboard video series hosted by Snorkel AI. Check out the episode here:

Some of the primary facts that are exciting about PonderNet are:

  • PonderNet represents a general technique that can be applied to a wide variety of methods, techniques, network architectures, etc.
  • Intuitively makes some sense—it is easier to understand over other black-box-related methods and research.
  • Potentially able to save on computational costs.
  • Generate dramatically improved SotA results over previous SotA adaptive computation methods. 

Abstract: 

In standard neural networks, the amount of computation used is directly proportional to the size of the inputs, instead of the complexity of the problem being learned. To overcome this limitation, we introduce PonderNet, a new algorithm that learns to adapt the amount of computation based on the complexity of the problem at hand. PonderNet requires minimal changes to the network architecture and learns end-to-end the number of computational steps to achieve an effective compromise between training prediction accuracy, computational cost and generalization. On a complex synthetic problem, PonderNet dramatically improves performance over previous state-of-the-art adaptive computation methods by also succeeding at extrapolation tests where traditional neural networks fail. Finally, we tested our method on a real-world question and answering dataset where we matched the current state-of-the-art results using less compute. Ultimately, PonderNet reached state-of-the-art results on a complex task designed to test the reasoning capabilities of neural networks.


If you are interested in learning with us, consider joining us at our biweekly ML whiteboard.Stay in touch with Snorkel AI, follow us on TwitterLinkedInFacebookYoutube, or Instagram, and if you’re interested in joining the Snorkel team, we’re hiring! Please apply on our careers page.

Share this article

Recommended articles

View all articles
Image
Grok 4.5 Testing Results: How SpaceXAI’s New Model Performs on Real Professional Work
We’ve evaluated Grok 4.5 on Snorkel’s GDPval+ dataset, Snorkel’s expert-created dataset of professional workplace reasoning tasks from across the economy. To compare performance against other frontier models, we ran the evaluation alongside GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8. Overall, Grok 4.5 demonstrated the strongest overall performance. Dataset GDPval+ is part of the Snorkel Data Series (SDS), Snorkel’s portfolio of expert-curated
July 8, 2026
Jacob Fleisig
agents-last-exam-thumbnail
Agents’ Last Exam: AI Benchmarking for Real Work
At our latest Snorkel AI Reading Group, Yiyou Sun and David (Xinyang) Han (UC Berkeley, Center for Responsible and Decentralized Intelligence) presented Agents’ Last Exam (ALE) — a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on long-horizon, economically valuable, real-world tasks with verifiable outcomes. ALE is a collaboration between Berkeley RDI, Snorkel AI, and 300+ expert contributors across 55 professional subfields. ALE asks a deceptively simple question: can
June 30, 2026
Snorkel Team
continual-learning-bench-featured-image
Continual learning and evaluating how AI agents learn across sequences of tasks
Most agent benchmarks evaluate each task as an independent episode. The agent receives a task, produces an answer, gets scored, and moves on. The next task starts as if the previous one never happened. That setup misses a core requirement for deployed agents. A coding agent, research assistant, data analyst, or workplace assistant should improve as it works across repeated
June 29, 2026
Chris Glaze
Image

Join our newsletter

For expert advice, the latest research, and exclusive events.
By submitting this form, I acknowledge I will receive email updates from Snorkel AI, and I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that my information will be used in accordance with the Privacy Policy.