Research

Training Classifiers With Natural Language Explanations

May 24, 2021
2 min read

Machine Learning Whiteboard (MLW) Open-source Series

Earlier this year, we started our machine learning whiteboard (MLW) series, an open-invite space to brainstorm ideas and discuss the latest papers, techniques, and workflows in the AI space. We emphasize an informal and open environment to everyone interested in learning about machine learning.In this episode, our Co-founder and Head of Technology. Braden Hancock speaks about “Training Classifiers with Natural Language Explanations,” a research paper by Braden Hancock, Paroma Varma, Stephanie Wang, Martin Bringmann, Percy Liang, and Christopher Ré presented at ACL 2018.This episode is part of the #MLwhiteboard video series hosted by the Snorkel AI team. Check out the episode here:

Abstract:

Training accurate classifiers requires many labels, but each label provides only limited information (one bit for binary classification). In this work, we propose BabbleLabble, a framework for training classifiers in which an annotator provides a natural language explanation for each labeling decision. A semantic parser converts these explanations into programmatic labeling functions that generate noisy labels for an arbitrary amount of unlabeled data, which is used to train a classifier. On three relation extraction tasks, we find that users are able to train classifiers with comparable F1 scores from 5-100× faster by providing explanations instead of just labels. Furthermore, given the inherent imperfection of labeling functions, we find that a simple rule-based semantic parser suffices.


If you are interested in learning with us, consider joining us at our biweekly ML whiteboard.If you’re interested in staying in touch with Snorkel AI, follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Youtube, or Instagram, and if you’re interested in joining the Snorkel team, we’re hiring! Please apply on our careers page.

Share this article

Recommended articles

View all articles
os-world-reading-group
OSWorld 2.0: Why Long-Horizon Computer-Use Agents Still Fail Four Out of Five Tasks
Mengqi Yuan (XLANG Lab, University of Hong Kong) presents OSWorld 2.0, a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows where even frontier AI agents complete only 20.6% of tasks outright after 300+ steps each.
September 3, 2026
Snorkel Team
Image
Fable 5.1 on Frontier Coding Tasks: Efficient Successes, Distinct Failure Modes
We evaluated Fable 5.1 on a series of frontier coding tasks from our proprietary Terminal-Bench+ dataset and compared the results against Opus 5. Fable remained competitive across most categories and was materially more efficient on successful runs, while its gap was concentrated in a small set of terminal-heavy and build/dependency tasks. Because category sizes are small and uneven, we treat
September 1, 2026
Ankit Aich
,
Jonathan Schlosser
Image
Terminal-Bench 4.0: Why Continuous Benchmarks Require Continuous QA
The speed of new frontier model releases keeps accelerating. Meanwhile benchmarks struggle to keep up and saturate quickly, often being left in the dust. Most benchmarks are static datasets with no active maintenance, causing them to lose value fast. Some benchmarks are looking to change this by becoming Continuous Benchmarks. Terminal-Bench is one of the most widely reported benchmarks on
August 28, 2026
Justin Bauer
Image

Join our newsletter

For expert advice, the latest research, and exclusive events.
By submitting this form, I acknowledge I will receive email updates from Snorkel AI, and I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that my information will be used in accordance with the Privacy Policy.