Research

Multi-Resolution Weak Supervision for Sequential Data

June 25, 2021
2 min read

Machine Learning Whiteboard (MLW) Open-source Series

Our machine learning whiteboard (MLW) is an open-invite space to brainstorm ideas and discuss the latest papers, techniques, and workflows in the AI space. We emphasize an informal and open environment to everyone interested in discovering more about machine learning.In this episode, Hiromu Hota, Vincent Sunn Chen, Daniel Y. Fu, and Frederic Sala dive into “Multi-Resolution Weak Supervision for Sequential Data,” a paper authored by Frederic Sala, Paroma Varma, Jason Fries, Daniel Y. Fu, Shiori Sagawa, Saelig Khattar, Ashwini Ramamoorthy, Ke Xiao, Kayvon Fatahalian, James Priest, and Christopher Ré presented at NeurIPS 2019.This episode is part of the #MLwhiteboard video series hosted by Snorkel AI. Check out the episode here:

Abstract:

Since manually labeling training data is slow and expensive, recent industrial and scientific research efforts have turned to weaker or noisier forms of supervision sources. However, existing weak supervision approaches fail to model multi-resolution sources for sequential data, like video, that can assign labels to individual elements or collections of elements in a sequence. A key challenge in weak supervision is estimating the unknown accuracies and correlations of these sources without using labeled data. Multi-resolution sources exacerbate this challenge due to complex correlations and sample complexity that scales in the length of the sequence. We propose Dugong, the first framework to model multi-resolution weak supervision sources with complex correlations to assign probabilistic labels to training data. Theoretically, we prove that Dugong, under mild conditions, can uniquely recover the unobserved accuracy and correlation parameters and use parameter sharing to improve sample complexity. Our method assigns clinician-validated labels to population-scale biomedical video repositories, helping outperform traditional supervision by 36.8 F1 points and addressing a key use case where machine learning has been severely limited by the lack of expert labeled data. On average, Dugong improves over traditional supervision by 16.0 F1 points and existing weak supervision approaches by 24.2 F1 points across several video and sensor classification tasks.


If you are interested in learning with us, consider joining us at our biweekly ML whiteboard.If you’re interested in staying in touch with Snorkel AI, follow us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Youtube, or Instagram, and if you’re interested in joining the Snorkel team, we’re hiring! Please apply on our careers page.

Share this article

Recommended articles

View all articles
judgment-bench-paper
JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessment
At our latest Snorkel AI Reading Group, Russell Yang (AI Engineering Fellow at Stanford Law) stopped by our San Francisco office to present JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessment. As AI models improve at open-ended tasks, the field faces a harder problem: how to measure quality in domains where ground truth is contested. Two paradigms dominate: rubric-based
June 18, 2026
Alexis Sobel
benchmarks-3-axis
The Art and Science of Building AI Benchmarks That Shape the Field
Vincent Sunn Chen spoke at AI Engineer London about what it actually takes to build AI benchmarks that move the field forward, not just measure it. The throughline is an asymmetry that keeps showing up across deployments and the 150+ proposals reviewed for the Open Benchmarks Grants: agent capabilities are climbing fast, but the ability to measure those agents with
June 16, 2026
Snorkel Team
Image
Cua-Bench: benchmarking computer-use agents on professional software
TL;DR We built a benchmark of 25 expert-authored KiCad schematic-editing tasks and ran a frontier computer-use agent against them. The headline numbers: 1. Why build a computer-use benchmark for electrical engineering? Most computer-use benchmarks today live in the same handful of apps: web browsers, file managers, generic productivity suites. Those evaluations are useful, but they share a structural weakness —
June 15, 2026
Armin Parchami
,
Zhengyang (Jason) Qi
Image

Join our newsletter

For expert advice, the latest research, and exclusive events.
By submitting this form, I acknowledge I will receive email updates from Snorkel AI, and I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that my information will be used in accordance with the Privacy Policy.