Research

Intelligence per watt: A new metric for AI’s future

November 12, 2025
3 min read

The AI community has been obsessed with bigger models and more data centers. But researchers at Stanford’s Hazy Research Lab are proposing we optimize for something entirely different.

They’ve introduced Intelligence per watt (IPW)—a new metric that fundamentally reframes how we should think about AI utilization in an era of exploding demand. Their paper breaks down the challenge and the opportunity, pointing us toward a compelling path forward for future research and innovation.

Efficiency is critical to meet ever-growing demand

Demand for AI computation is growing exponentially, with Google reporting an 8.1x increase in tokens processed per month from February 2024 to October 2025. However, the Hazy Research team also observes that internal ChatGPT telemetry data shows 77% of requests are practical tasks like writing emails or summarizing documents. In other words, for well over three fourths of real-world AI usage, we’re shipping routine queries–requests that could be answered accurately on the local device–to frontier-level models in datacenters. 

History offers a better path. From 1946-2009, computing efficiency doubled every 1.5 years, shifting workloads from mainframes to PCs. PCs won not through raw performance, but because efficiency improvements made computing capable enough within personal device power constraints.

We’re at that same inflection point with AI inference. Can we get more of our needs met on the edge, where power efficiency is greater and the absolute maximum AI reasoning capabilities are unnecessary? Can the exponential growth in demand for AI be met more effectively through better leverage of the devices in our pockets and backpacks? The Hazy Research team says yes!

Hazy Research’s intelligence per watt

The Hazy Research team defined IPW elegantly:

IPW = (mean accuracy across tasks) / (mean power draw during inference)

Their empirical study—20+ local models, diverse hardware, 1 million real-world queries—reveals three key findings:

  1. Local LMs accurately respond to 88.7% of single-turn queries, with accuracy improving 3.1× from 2023-2025
  2. Local accelerators have significant efficiency headroom—the M4 Max achieves 1.5× lower IPW than NVIDIA B200 for the same model
  3. Intelligence efficiency has improved 5.3× over the past two years through combined model and hardware advances

Snorkel AI’s contribution to the IPW initiative

At Snorkel AI, we’ve built benchmarks to evaluate frontier LLMs across expert-level, domain-specific tasks using our Expert Data-as-a-Service—powered by a global network of specialists across thousands of domains.

We’re excited to contribute these specialized datasets to Hazy Research Lab’s Intelligence Per Watt initiative. While their foundational work focused on general chat and reasoning, real-world deployment demands domain-specific evaluation.

By combining Hazy Research’s IPW measurement framework with Snorkel’s industry-relevant benchmarks—spanning insurance underwriting, financial analysis, legal review, and PhD-level technical domains—we can drive an industry-wide shift in how we approach AI’s compute needs.

This partnership will answer critical questions: How efficiently can local models handle medical reasoning? What’s the IPW for regulatory compliance tasks? Can edge devices deliver expert-level performance within power budgets?

The path forward

Hazy Research’s Intelligence Per Watt metric should guide AI’s transition to the edge, just as performance-per-watt guided the mainframe-to-PC shift. They’re releasing a hardware-agnostic profiling harness to make IPW measurement systematic and accessible. 

The future of AI isn’t just bigger models—it’s smarter systems delivering the right intelligence, in the right place, with the right efficiency. Snorkel AI is proud to support this vision with specialized datasets that ensure IPW becomes an important consideration for real-world enterprise deployment.


Read the full paper here and check out hazyresearch.stanford.edu for more information about Stanford University’s Hazy Research Lab, headed by Snorkel AI cofounder Chris Ré. Learn more about Snorkel AI’s data-centric approach at snorkel.ai.

Share this article

Recommended articles

View all articles
os-world-reading-group
OSWorld 2.0: Why Long-Horizon Computer-Use Agents Still Fail Four Out of Five Tasks
Mengqi Yuan (XLANG Lab, University of Hong Kong) presents OSWorld 2.0, a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows where even frontier AI agents complete only 20.6% of tasks outright after 300+ steps each.
September 3, 2026
Snorkel Team
Image
Fable 5.1 on Frontier Coding Tasks: Efficient Successes, Distinct Failure Modes
We evaluated Fable 5.1 on a series of frontier coding tasks from our proprietary Terminal-Bench+ dataset and compared the results against Opus 5. Fable remained competitive across most categories and was materially more efficient on successful runs, while its gap was concentrated in a small set of terminal-heavy and build/dependency tasks. Because category sizes are small and uneven, we treat
September 1, 2026
Ankit Aich
,
Jonathan Schlosser
Image
Terminal-Bench 4.0: Why Continuous Benchmarks Require Continuous QA
The speed of new frontier model releases keeps accelerating. Meanwhile benchmarks struggle to keep up and saturate quickly, often being left in the dust. Most benchmarks are static datasets with no active maintenance, causing them to lose value fast. Some benchmarks are looking to change this by becoming Continuous Benchmarks. Terminal-Bench is one of the most widely reported benchmarks on
August 28, 2026
Justin Bauer
Image

Join our newsletter

For expert advice, the latest research, and exclusive events.
By submitting this form, I acknowledge I will receive email updates from Snorkel AI, and I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that my information will be used in accordance with the Privacy Policy.